![]() ![]() ![]() The Respondent failed to erect the buildings within 3. TWO police detectives appeared at the Harare Magistrates Court yesterday charged with criminal abuse of office after they took bribes to conceal the theft of Presidential farming inputs. (References omitted. 19 hours ago &0183 &32 Source: Cops in court over stolen Presidential inputs Newsday Zimbabwe. Research shows that unreasonable delays in finalising disciplinary cases affect the health and can even cause excruciating distress on the employees concerned (Van der Bank, Engelbrecht and Strumpher “Perceived Fairness of Disciplinary Procedures in the Public Service Sector: An Exploratory Study: Empirical Research” 2008 6(2) SA Journal of Human Resource Management 8). eThekwini Municipality v Mounthaven Proprietary Limited 2018 ZACC 43 (31 October 2018). Case no: 1394/2018 In the matter between: JONE JOHN MOTLOUNG FIRST APPELLANT MOSELE MERRIAM MOLOI SECOND APPELLANT and THE SHERIFF, PRETORIA EAST RESPONDENT. In this context, the maxim is used to emphasise that delays in finalising employment disciplinary processes may amount to a denial of justice. Neutral citation: The Ad Hoc Central Authority for the Republic of SA and Another v Koch N.O. Willis JA, however, relies upon certain dicta of Mogoeng CJ in the case of My Vote Counts NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services & another 2018 Z(8) BCLR 893 (CC) as support for the proposition that it is sufficient for this court to articulate the proposed limitation on the right of the media to impart information. Section 6(a) of the Interpretation Act 33 of 1957 states: In every law, unless the contrary intention appears (a) words importing the masculine gender include females. “Justice delayed is justice denied” is a legal maxim which denotes that if legal redress is available to a party that has suffered, or is suffering an injustice but is not dispensed timeously, it has the same effect as having no redress at all (see Steenkamp J sentiments in Road Accident Fund v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration ZALCJHB 139 par 5 see also the definition at Definitions and Translations (accessed )). Zondo (unanimous) Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Prince 2018 ZACC 30 is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered on 18 September 2018, which found that it is unconstitutional for the state to criminalize the possession, use or cultivation of cannabis by adults for personal consumption. Ramuhovhi v President of the Republic of South Africa 2017 Z(2) SA 1 (CC) 2018 (2) BCLR 217 (CC) at para 62 read with fn 50. Stokwe v Member of the Executive Council: Department of Education, Eastern Cape Abstract
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |